Bad boy bail bonds Las Vegas- The forms of bail bonds in Las Vegas

The forms of bail bonds in Las Vegas

With the advent of Law 12,403 / 11, the use of the bail institute within our legal system was significantly increased. As a result of this legislative innovation, which amended the Code of Criminal Procedure in the part dealing with prisons and various precautionary measures, infractions whose maximum sentences summarized in abstract do not exceed 04 years are subject to provisional release by means of bail in the policy sphere.

In this context, common crimes such as simple theft, receiving, intoxication behind the wheel, etc., are assured by the police officer himself, which undoubtedly reflects in the decarburization policy now so fostered by the implementation of custody hearings. However, situations in which the police authority establishes bail amounts are not uncommon, but the inmate is not in a position to pay.

It is at this point that an interesting question arises and little touched upon by doctrine. We refer to cases where the magistrate when analyzing the indictment in flagrante, grants provisional release on bail for the benefit of the prisoner, but the prisoner fails to pay it. In these situations, the question arises: what is the title of this prison?

This, then, is not autonomous and can not justify the maintenance of segregation, which is only based on its conversion into pre-trial detention, otherwise, its freedom must be restored through a different precautionary measure.

Having said that, we have stated that the approach to this question must be divided into two aspects, if not yet. If the inmate fails to pay the bail because he does not have the financial conditions to do so, it will be up to the judge to reduce the amount of this injunction or even to waive it under the terms of article 325 , paragraph 1 , items I and II of the CPP.

On the other hand, if the inmate fails to pay the bail even if the financial conditions for it are fulfilled, it will be for the judge, as the case may be, to substitute this precautionary measure for another one of the prison or to decree the preventive measure by virtue of the previous noncompliance with the measure decreed, as expressed in article 312 , sole paragraph , with article 282 , §§ 4 and 6 , of the CPP .

Things that are property, such as homes, cars, money, stocks, etc., are often required by bondsmen for collateral because they will sell those items to pay off the rest of the bail amount if the defendant does not show up at court.  click here now to learn more about bail and bail bonds.

In this context, it is not possible that the arrest in flagrante will last for one or two months awaiting the payment of the fixed bail. It should be borne in mind that in these cases the provisional release granted to the inmate is conditional on the payment of the bail. Thus, if this condition is not met within a reasonable time, the restriction of freedom will only be justified with the enactment of preventive custody.

Taking an analogy with article 322 , sole paragraph , of the CPP , we understand that the incarcerated in flagrante would have the term of up to 48 hours to pay the guarantee, otherwise, the judge would be authorized to replace it with another precautionary measure or even to convert the flagrant pre-trial detention, as already mentioned. In such situations, therefore, the actual red-handed arrest would exceptionally be the basis for the restriction of the detainee’s freedom. Consequently, it’s maximum duration, which normally is 24 hours, would last for up to 72 hours.

In any case, it should be clear that the decision taken by the judicial authority at the time of the examination of the arrest warrant in flagrante must always be justified, which is absolutely in accordance with Article 93, paragraph IX, of the Constitution of the Republic.

Decriminalization of the crime of bigamy

Crime of bigamy 

Crime of bigamy 

What ethic is this that still considers “bigamy” a crime, and not, “adultery”, which since Law No. 11.106 / 05, is no longer considered a crime? So can I betray my spouse, at ease, as long as nobody knows? But if I resolve to take on my “second spouse” in public, officializing my marriage through marriage, do I commit “crime of bigamy,” even if my spouse agrees?

I do not understand this, for to me what counts is the true intention of the people and not the appearances. This ethic distorted by the convention that marriage can only be one, is that it has awakened several crimes of passion. Would not it be time to review these hypocritical concepts and values? After all, having more than one spouse at the same time could not be considered a crime anywhere, since many (more evolved) people no longer care about the exclusiveness and sexual possessiveness that they consider to be an outdated and stingy value.

These exclusivist and selfish values ​​ignore the love reality of many people who, despite having more than one spouse, are forced to keep up appearances by hiding the “second spouse”, otherwise they will be locked into saddles as if they were real criminals. Often these “criminals” who make up more than one family are happier than many traditional families of faithful but unhappy people.

Is not it time to review these selfish and mediocre values ​​and decriminalize bigamy, just as it was done with adultery? In fact, these people who dare to love more than one spouse, and build more than one family, should be examples for society, in that they often sacrifice themselves to keep more than one home, despite the difficulties and prejudices they face.

In laws or contracts

In laws or contracts

In today’s world where selfishness and individualism reign, this should be an example of solidarity and altruism. In the present times any form of love is valid, as long as it is for the improvement of marital and family happiness. True love, of course, should have no limits in rules pre-established in laws or contracts.

In fact, just as it is now possible for the couple to stipulate an arrangement of property proper to their marriage through the prenuptial agreement, it should also be possible to stipulate the type of marriage they desire: whether monogamy or polygamy. Only when this is possible will we have achieved true social democracy in its broadest and most democratic sense, that is, without the exclusion of anyone, much less of the “lovers” who are often responsible for the total happiness of the so-called traditional families.

In this sense, law should accompany the evolution of society’s customs and play its proper role, that is, regulate, through laws, as many factual situations as possible, and especially those that have been forgotten by the legislator, as is the case of polygamy. Thus, polygamy should be rethought and regulated by our legislators, even if they do not agree with this practice, because it is not a problem of the right to establish moral norms but to identify and regulate rights. Finally, to the Law, it is only up to regulate and protect people and their rights equally and without prejudice. After all, everyone is equal before the law and deserves the same legal protection in their family relations whatever they may be.

I leave here a question for reflection: to what extent can the State legislate by restricting the formation of new family nuclei in the way they are formed today, without restricting the number or sex of its components, and without discriminating against other forms of family that may with the evolution of society? Can the State prevent people from living together in a family relationship and acquiring rights derived from this coexistence simply because they want to form a family different from the traditional one? I do not think, then, that the State can not interfere in the intimate and family life of people, especially in relation to fundamental questions such as the search for happiness through personal fulfillment within the family, which must be protected in a way that does not restrict the possibilities There are many that exist for the formation of new families other than the conventional ones in order to really protect the fundamental right of people to live in a free, democratic, ethical, harmonious, loving, responsible and happy way.

$ 50 bail and ban from leaving Miami for Pablo Lyle for hitting the elderly man who died later

US Judge Alan S. Fine imposed on Mexican soap opera actor Pablo Lyle a $ 50,000 bond on Monday barring him from leaving Miami until the next hearing, scheduled for May 1, related to the death of a beaten man in a discussion about traffic.

The actor’s mother fainted in the middle of the hearing in which Lyle appeared, whose lawyers defended that he only hit the deceased and that “he never intended to kill anyone”, so “it is not a murder case”.

The audience of the actor, the actress Ana Araujo and the son of Juan Ricardo Hernández, the 63-year-old Cuban died last Thursday at the Jackson Hospital in Miami, to which he was transferred immediately after the incident, which occurred on March 31.

Released on $ 5,000 bail

Released on $ 5,000 bail

Lyle, who has so far been released on $ 5,000 bail, must use an electronic shackle once he deposits the new bail.

The Office of the Prosecutor had requested that a bail of one million dollars be imposed on “a possible murder case in the second degree,” but Judge Fine only set the amount of 50,000, as requested by the defense.

According to a video recorded by a security camera, after hitting Hernandez, the car in which Lyle was traveling when a passenger left the place leaving the Cuban unconscious on the floor.

The 32-year-old actor was arrested hours later and then placed on probation after posting bail of $ 5,000.

On Tuesday, April 2, she requested permission from the court to travel to her country, which was granted by Miami-Dade County Magistrate, Lisa Walsh.

Review the bond

Review the bond

That same judge, when the death of Hernandez was known on Friday, ordered the actor to appear at a hearing on Monday to review the bond.

“Mr. Lyle will appear when the court so requires,” his attorney, Bruce Lehr, told the Miami Herald.

Lyle, protagonist of the telenovela “My adorable curse”, declared that he left the scene because he feared for the safety of his six-year-old son, who was traveling with him.

According to the police report, and as seen in the video of the security camera, Hernandez got out of his car at a red light and came to claim through the window the occupants of the vehicle where Lyle was going because he had closed the door. path.

The driver of the car in which Lyle was traveling came out and argued with Hernandez, but then returned to the vehicle when he realized he was moving.

The actor, who had also gotten out of the car, punched him in the face that left him lying on the ground unconscious.

According to local media such as America TeVe, Hernandez had planned to marry last Friday with his partner three years ago.

Whose money does a person in jail earn?

The prison system

The prison system

Tomorrow it will be released in bookstores This was me, a collection of stories about life in prison written by Curtis Dawkins, a man who is serving a life sentence for murder in a Michigan prison in the United States. The book was published in the United States last summer by Scribner, one of the most prestigious American publishing houses, has already been translated in the Netherlands, will also be published in Germany and in Italy is published by Mondadori. Only as an advance for the American edition Dawkins got 150 thousand dollars, about 121 thousand euros. Now, however, says an article in the New York Times, the state of Michigan would like this money to pay for the food and housing that the prison system is giving to Dawkins.

More than forty American states, including Michigan, can in fact force their inmates to pay the costs of their incarceration, including the costs of transport by police vehicles, those for office defense, drug tests and electronic monitoring in case they are out on bail. The laws in this regard have been introduced in recent decades because the number of people in prisons has increased – due to increasingly harsh repressive policies even against non-violent crimes – and so the costs of the prison system have increased: it hosts more than 2.2 millions of adults. In most cases, inmates are not wealthy people, so states usually do not cover a lot of expenses by taking their money: in the last fiscal year the state of Michigan got $ 3.7 million from 294 of its nearly 40 thousand inmates.

Prisoners have to pay for their maintenance

Prisoners have to pay for their maintenance

In some states the money laws that prisoners have to pay for their maintenance cannot be applied if the prisoners are unable to pay. However, states try in every way to get money from prisoners; often, for example, they take a huge percentage of the earnings that prisoners get by participating in professional programs. In some cases, states have received more substantial repayments when their prisoners have received inheritance or compensation. The state of Illinois took 20 thousand of the 31 thousand dollars obtained as inheritance from the death of his mother by a prisoner sentenced to serve 15 months for a drug-related crime: at his exit from prison, in 2015, he remained practically without money. The state of Florida took 55 thousand of the 150 thousand dollars obtained from a prisoner negotiating with the same prison department of the state in a negligence trial: the one for which it was possible that another detainee took an eye from him in 2011. Usually when the prisoners and the ex-prisoners sue states for these cash withdrawals, states win trials.

In the case of Curtis Dawkins, the state of Michigan wants 90 percent of the money it has earned and will earn with This was me ( The original Graybar Hotel ), so both the advance it received and the royalties on the number of copies sold and the proceeds from the sale of translation rights in other countries: money that Dawkins has partly put into a fund to allow his three children aged 23, 19 and 17 to study. The state also wants 90 percent of the money that Dawkins’ family puts into his account in prison: he has estimated that since Dawkins has been in prison since 2005, he has spent more than 372 thousand dollars, almost 300 thousand euros. To get this money, Michigan filed a lawsuit against Dawkins last October and a hearing will be held on February 26th. According to the prosecution Dawkins, his parents and his literary agent Sandra Dijkstra had no right to allocate the proceeds of the publication of This was me to the children of ergastolano.

Dawkins’ stories have received good reviews in the United States; for example those of the novelist Nickolas Butler, who was persuaded to publicly praise the collection after learning that Dawkins felt intense remorse for killing a man.

Dawkins has done university studies (English literature at Southern Illinois University and writing at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo) but before he was sentenced to life imprisonment he did not have great financial resources. The murder for which he was sentenced is linked to a history of serious addictions to alcohol and other substances, which began when Dawkins was only 12 (today he is 49) and alternated with periods of sobriety. In the early 2000s Dawkins had three children and sold cars for work, but he didn’t have much money and he and his partner often argued: at that time he developed an addiction to opioid drugs (a problem that has become widespread in the States in recent years United), then from ketamine and heroin. In 2004 his partner asked him to go and live elsewhere, the use of drugs made him paranoid of drug dealers and for this he bought himself a gun to protect himself.

The murder took place on the evening of October 30, 2004. Dawkins smoked crack, a substance he later told the police he had never tried before, and drank alcohol for the first time in many years. Then he put on a 1920s gangster Halloween costume and a monster mask, took his gun and started wandering around the neighborhood around Western Michigan University. At one point he fired shots into the air and then tried to rob Thomas Bowman, a 48-year-old man who was on his front porch: Dawkins asked him for money and when Bowman refused to give it to him, Dawkins shot him, killing him.

Dawkins began writing fiction a year after his arrest, initially as a therapeutic one, to get rid of the suicidal instincts he felt. His parents sent him a typewriter in prison, he began to send stories – mostly set in jail, in some cases clearly autobiographical, in other surreal – to his sister who then sent them to small literary magazines. Jarrett Haley, the founder of one of these, Bull, helped Dawkins put together a collection of short stories and be represented by a literary agent, Sandra Dijkstra. Dijkstra managed to sell the collection of stories to Scribner in 2016. Dawkins divided the advance with Haley, who had helped him get the contract for the book; the rest of the money, a little more than 50 thousand dollars, was put into a fund for his children. So far they have paid school fees, textbooks, car payments and dental care.

After the state of Michigan sued Dawkins last October, Dijkstra blocked all payments from the publisher (including the second part of the advance, which should have arrived in the coming months) at the request of the state. The state then blocked the account that Dawkins has in prison, the one in which his family has always sent him 200 to 300 dollars a month and that the imprisonment uses to make phone calls, send emails, eat snacks and buy paper for write: in the last few months Dawkins has done all these things with $ 25 a month and will defend himself at the February 26 hearing because he cannot afford to pay a lawyer.

Dawkins will try to win the lawsuit against Michigan based on the fact that state law requires the court to take into consideration “every legal and moral obligation” that the detainee has towards his children or spouse. For Dawkins his children should not be punished for him. While waiting for the trial, he continues to write: he is working on a dystopian novel set in a subterranean prison where prisoners are kept in a state of hibernation.

Laws that force prisoners to pay the costs

Laws that force prisoners to pay the costs

Supporters of the laws that force prisoners to pay the costs of their incarceration say that all prisoners who can afford it should do so. According to some activists for the rights of prisoners, however, imposing these reimbursements can make rehabilitation more difficult, given that it limits the possibility of helping their families (and themselves, in case their release is envisaged at a certain point). These activists think that laws like the one in Michigan violate the Eighth Amendment of the American Constitution, which prohibits cruel punishments and excessive fines for those who have committed crimes. According to some legal experts, states should encourage activities among prisoners, rather than punish them for doing them.

The story of the publication of This was also generated other questions on moral issues. According to Kenneth Bowman, the brother of the man killed by Dawkins, a life sentence should not have the opportunity to write and publish his own stories, and the money he earned in this way should be used to compensate his family or finance a charity. Bowman’s mother, in an old New York Times article, had been less harsh: she said she had forgiven Dawkins and was glad that she had found comfort in writing since she could not imagine anything worse than life imprisonment.

The First Amendment of the American Constitution allows inmates to publish books for the principle of freedom of expression, but there have been cases where states have limited the ability of their prisoners to publish and be paid for their books. For example, the writer Malcolm Braly published his novel Air Time in 1967, two years after being released for good conduct, because according to prison department officials publishing it earlier would have violated the conditions of his early release. In many states prisoners are forbidden to receive compensation for writing truthful reports of their crimes: if such reports are published or turned into films, the proceeds must be donated to the victims or their families. In support of the perplexities of those who do not like the possibility for prisoners to write, there is the case of Jack Henry Abbott: in 1981 the Random House publishing house published In the Belly of the Beast, while he was in prison for having robbed a bank and other crimes; the writer Norman Mailer befriended Abbott and worked hard to get him out of prison, but as soon as Abbott left, he was arrested again for stabbing and killing a waiter.

How to invest in multi-year treasury bonds

In this article we want to illustrate all the main features of the Long-Term Treasury Bonds (BTP), their use as a form of investment. Our goal is to provide you with the tools necessary to establish how to invest in multi-year treasury bonds (BTPs) and estimate their performance.

What are multi-year treasury bonds (BTPs) ? How do BTPs work? Is it possible to use BTPs to get a good return?

Surely the Multi-year Treasury Bonds (BTP) are one of the most popular financial instruments and it is therefore of fundamental importance to understand how they work and to know how to profit from the BTPs.

To better understand what the yield on multi-year treasury bonds (BTPs) may be, we must start from some basic concepts.

The bonds : they are cash loans that recognize a periodic interest to investors through coupons.

All the states issue bonds and in the case of the Italian State, these are called Government Securities or Treasury Bills (BTP). These loans recognize, through coupons, an interest at fixed intervals over time (which usually has a half-yearly frequency).

The BTPs ( Treasury Bonds ) have a maturity of 3, 5, 7.10, 15, 20, 30 and 50 years and guarantee a payment of the six-month returns.

The nominal value of the BTP is equal to 100 in conjunction with the issue and maturity. BTP taxation is 12.5 for the State (but increases to 26% for private individuals).

But what is the return on long -term Treasury Bonds (BTPs)?

But what is the return on long -term Treasury Bonds (BTPs)?

The yield on long -term treasury bonds (BTPs) derives from two components:

  • the coupon flow
  • the difference with the subscription price

Clarified that a Long Term Treasury Bonds (BTP) always has a nominal value of 100, we note that the price on the market of a BTP can vary, assuming lower quotations (for example 80) or higher quotations (for example 120).

To calculate the yield of net BTPs, regardless of their maturity, these parameters must be taken into account:

  • the BTP purchase price ;
  • the coupon, ie the interest that accrues on that BTP;
  • purchase costs, ie the commissions to be paid for the purchase of a BTP to the intermediary;
  • performance taxes, by law you have to pay taxes at 12.5% (for the State) and 26% for private individuals;
  • the tax on the issue spread, ie on the difference between the value of the BTP at the time of issue and the value at the time the investor takes possession of it.
  • the taxes on the capital gain, that is on the gain beyond the issue price.

From 2012 the BTP Italia is available from the Italian State, with a 4-year maturity. On BTP Italia you can invest a thousand euros or multiples of it. The investor can receive annual coupons paid every six months (for example, a 4% Italian BTP pays two half-yearly coupons of 2% each).

The yield of BTP Italia has a fixed rate, communicated at the end of the subscription period, and calculated on the revalued capital based on actual inflation in Italy.

At the expiry of the BTP, when the coupon is paid to the investor, two situations can occur:

Purchase BTP with price below 100

In this case, at the time of issue we purchased the BTP at lower value and therefore at maturity we realize a gain equal to the difference to 100, to which the 12.5% ​​tax must then be deducted.


  • Purchase: 90
  • Capital gain: 100-90 = 10
  • Tax on capital gain: 10 * 12.5% ​​= 1.25
  • Net repaid: 100 – 1.25 = 98.75

Purchase BTP with a price over 100

In this case, at the time of issue we purchased the BTP at higher value and therefore at maturity we realize a gain equal to the difference at 100 (capital gain) less the 12.5% ​​tax. In this case you will receive a net repayment that coincides with the nominal value.


  • Purchase: 110
  • Capital gain: 100-110 = -10
  • tax credit on capital gains: -10 * -12.5% ​​= 1.25
  • Net repaid: 100

What are the risks for those investing in multi-year treasury bonds (BTPs)

What are the risks for those investing in multi-year treasury bonds (BTPs)

If you purchase BTPs and intend to keep them until maturity, the only risk you run is the fact that you are a creditor and that, whoever issues the bonds, ie the Treasury, may not pay the coupons or repay the principal.

Another risk that you run is that of the market, that is, if you sell (for any reason) the BTPs before the expiry. In fact, if the market were to fluctuate and there was a rise in yields, the BTP price may fall, causing a capital loss.

Why invest in multi-year treasury bills (BTP)

Why invest in multi-year treasury bills (BTP)

Summing up we can say that investing in BTP is worthwhile for the following reasons:

  • BTPs are particularly suitable bonds for medium, long or very long term investments;
  • the BTPs guarantee fixed periodic coupons and therefore regular and predetermined collections;
  • BTPs have a medium / low risk, being issued by a sovereign state, if you keep them until maturity. First you could have capital losses if the market fluctuates upwards, especially with long-term maturities.

Investing in long -term Treasury Bonds (BTPs) is not the only way to profit from financial markets and their performance. Remember that you can also profit by using online trading.

If you want to take the first steps in the world of online trading and profit from CFDs, contracts for Difference, shares, bonds, etf, commodities, cryptocurrencies, without risking too much capital initially, you can take advantage of the advice and reviews that Mr Bank puts at your disposal. You can consider one of the brokers in the table.

High Yield Bonds

Over the course of these years we have experienced rating agencies, and the rating itself, as a sort of scarecrow that hovered around our lives. Many nations, including Italy, Portugal, Greece and Spain just to name a few, have been waiting in the last decade for the “votes” of rating agencies as when an elementary school child waits for report cards to find out whether he will have joys or pains.

But there are those who look forward to these negative votes; in fact, we are talking about speculators and financial operators who operate in so-called “high yield” bonds.

But what are high yield bonds specifically and how can you profit from their bargaining? In this article we try to give you an overview of high yield bonds.



To better understand what “high yield” bonds are, it is better to start from the meaning of the term “high yield”; it literally refers to the high yield that can be obtained from the sale of this type of bonds.

These bonds are those that the rating agencies have baptized with a minimum rating of BB, that is to say that these bonds have a rate of default on the part of the company or sovereign issuer and are therefore very risky.

This type of bond offers a return on the coupon that is periodically removed for the collection of higher interest rates than the average ones offered on the market.

But all that glitters is not gold; in fact, if you invest in high yield bonds, the risk that the debtor may default, with a consequent loss of the invested capital, is definitely very high.

You must take into account that those who invest in “high yield” bonds do not however only invest in the portion of interest that can be collected at the end of a given period, but also invests in the price difference of the “high yield” bond, between the price paid for the purchase and the repayment value of the security.

Pay close attention to the fact that if we are talking about “high yield” bonds, we are referring to bonds issued by unreliable debtors that potentially offer bonds with higher yields.

The market of “high yield” bonds has had a remarkable development in the last period, when investors, in order to get more profits, have turned to financial instruments that are decidedly riskier.



To better clarify what “high yield” bonds are specifically, let’s try to give some examples of this type of obligation, going to list the main features.

A very explanatory example of high yield bonds are those issued by oil companies. In fact, this type of “high yield” bonds offer very high returns, far higher than the average ones offered by the market, worth billions of dollars, but also with a very high default risk, even now that the monetary tightening imposed from the United States have raised rates.

Until 2014 the investment in “high yield” bonds issued by US oil companies was really throbbing at all given the high oil prices and low interest rates. In fact, high prices guaranteed high revenues while low interest rates allowed oil companies to finance themselves at low cost.

Now the situation is slowly turning upside down: in fact, revenues are falling and rates are rising, with a risk of default for the issuers, and relative loss of capital by investors in high-yield bonds, which are very high indeed.

Another very important fact for those who invest in “high yield” bonds is that of duration: in fact it is advisable for small savers who wish to invest in this type of bonds to do so only with a small portion of their financial portfolio and for securities with a duration short. This above all for a reason: the market of “high yield” bonds generally has an offer of entry greater than that of exit, therefore one could be found for a fairly long period without the liquidity invested.



Let’s try to draw some conclusions after this journey among high yield bonds. These types of bonds can be an interesting investment opportunity as long as these conditions are met:

  • Duration of medium-court obligations;
  • Invest only a small part of your total capital;
  • Constantly monitor the market on which to invest, to avoid sectors in “crisis” smell;
  • Check the currency in which the securities are issued to avoid currency exchange costs.

We hope that our review will be useful for you to better calibrate your investments and to choose the most appropriate way for your investments, always following you carefully by a specialist in the sector.

If you want to take the first steps in the world of online trading, without risking too much capital initially, you can take advantage of the advice and reviews that Mr Banca puts at your disposal. You can consider one of the brokers in the table.